Sorry, GQ, But I’m Not Spending $2,290 On a Vest

Published On 10/02/2015 Published On 10/02/2015

Today was a big day. After coming across an article by GQ promoting a $2,290 cashmere vest from Mr. Porter—I made the executive decision to never spend more than $85 on a piece of clothing that specifically lacks sleeves. Look, guys, I get it: it's fall and it's not jacket weather yet, and everybody looks good sans sleeves, but I'm not spending almost $3,000 on a fucking vest. 

I get it, it's probably a very comfortable and warm vest and made from, like, goose tears or something, but it's a vest. A VEST! I could literally buy a used car for $2,290. I could put down $2,290 towards a small room in a nice luxury building in Williamsburg. $2,290 is a good chunk of money that you can deposit into the savings account or put towards a college fund for your kids. It's a lot of money that shouldn't be spent on one thing. 


The point is, GQ, I don't want to hang out with the type of guy who can throw down almost $3000 on a piece of clothing. Those are kinds of guys who drive asshole cars, own asshole sunglasses, and have destination weddings in New Zealand and then make you feel like a slice of shit when you tell them you'd have to give up eating for a month to buy a plane ticket. 

In fact, I'd feel inclined to punch a guy in the testicles if he told me his vest cost $2,290. There are plenty of websites that sell quality vests at a cheap price. JackThreads, for example. [Ed. note: JackThreads is owned by our boss. Thanks, boss!] Just had to get that off my chest. No pun intended. Well...yeah, some pun intended. 

Sign up here for our daily Thrillist email, and get your fix of the best in food/drink/fun.

Jeremy Glass is a writer for Thrillist and his entire outfit cost $30. 



Learn More