Fast forward to this week, when she checked her mail and allegedly found a bill for the two "herb crusted walleye" the couple would've eaten had they attended, as well as a service charge, making a grand total of $75.90. The bill also included a note: "This cost reflects the amount paid by the bride and groom for meals that were RSVP'd for, reimbursement and explanation for no show, card, call or text would be appreciated."
"I guess I don't know what the right answer would have been. What the right thing to do would have been," said Baker to KARE 11 News, in a far more calm and collected manner than many of us likely would've managed -- although she admittedly still isn't planning to pay the bill.
Granted, Baker probably should've contacted her friend and explained the no-show, but it seems a bit silly to retroactively charge someone for a thing they wouldn't have had to pay for in the first place.
Where do you fall on this contentious issue? Let us know in the comments below:
Sign up here for our daily Thrillist email, and get your fix of the best in food/drink/fun.
Gianni Jaccoma is a staff writer for Thrillist, and he thinks this story smells a little fishy. Follow his suspicious tweets @gjaccoma, and send your news tips to firstname.lastname@example.org